Impacts of Artificial Food Colors on Health and Environment

Explore the effects of artificial food colors on human health, the environment and the implications of animal testing. Learn about common animal-derived dyes and moving towards plant-based food dyes.

DYE-FREE LIVING

Danielle Evergreen

11/15/2024

six teal icing cupcakes with sprinkles
six teal icing cupcakes with sprinkles

In the vibrant world of food manufacturing, artificial food colors play a significant role in making meals and snacks visually appealing. These synthetic dyes, in everything from cereals to candies, have become an integral part of the modern food system. However, as consumers become more health-conscious and environmentally aware, the use of artificial food colors has come under increased scrutiny.

This controversy has gained renewed attention in 2024 when Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as part of his "Make America Healthy Again" platform, highlighted research suggesting links between common food dyes and behavioral issues in children. Kennedy has specifically targeted Red 40, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 - the three most widely used artificial food colors in the United States - citing studies that indicate potential connections to hyperactivity and attention problems.

It's encouraging to see public figures like RFK Jr. speaking out against artificial food additives. As an ordinary citizen, I've long had concerns about these substances, but it can be challenging to raise these issues without facing skepticism and being labeled a conspiracy theorist. Having prominent voices draw attention to this topic helps validate these important discussions about food safety and public health. I am super excited about his advocacy on this issue and where it will take the U.S. as a nation.

In this article we'll look into a brief description of the production methods of artificial food dyes, their environmental impact, potential health effects and the growing trend towards natural alternatives. By exploring these aspects, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of artificial food colors and their place, if any, in our food system.

Examining the Impact of Artificial Food Coloring

📢 Note: Some links in this post are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Know, I only recommend products I personally trust and use. Thank you!

Welcome!

Thanks for joining me here at Danielle Evergreen! I have been on a plant-based journey for 10 years now and it is my pleasure to research and bring you content on various topics. I am excited to create a community of people on similar journeys! Whether you're a long-time vegan dieter, interested in dye-free living or just dipping your toes in these waters, I am glad you are here!

- Danielle Evergreen

A Little History on Synthetic Food Dyes

As told by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,

Historical Perspectives: The Basis for Current Regulations

Naturally occurring color additives from vegetable and mineral sources were used to color foods, drugs, and cosmetics in ancient times. Paprika, turmeric, saffron, iron and lead oxides, and copper sulfate are some examples. The early Egyptians used artificial colors in cosmetics and hair dyes. Wine was artificially colored beginning in at least 300 BC.

In 1856, William Henry Perkin discovered the first synthetic organic dye, called mauve. Discoveries of similar dyes soon followed, and they quickly became used to color foods, drugs, and cosmetics. Because these dyes were first produced from by-products of coal processing, they were known as "coal-tar colors."

Federal oversight of color additives began in the 1880s. The assessment of color-imparting ingredients in foods was among the first public initiatives undertaken by the U.S. when, in 1881, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Bureau of Chemistry began research on the use of colors in food. Butter and cheese were the first foods for which the federal government authorized the use of artificial coloring.

By 1900, many foods, drugs, and cosmetics available in the U.S. were artificially colored. However, not all of the coloring agents were harmless, and some were being used to hide inferior or defective foods. A careful assessment of the chemicals used for coloring foods at the time found many blatantly poisonous materials such as lead, arsenic, and mercury being added. In many cases, the toxicities of the starting materials for synthesizing coloring agents were well known and could be toxins, irritants, sensitizers, or carcinogens.”

Head to their website (HERE) to continue the story about:

Food and Drugs Act of 1906

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938

Color Additive Amendments of 1960

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulations: Color Additives in Foods

  • FDA reasons for color additives in foods, candies, beverages:

    • Offset color loss due to light exposure, air, temperature, moisture and storage conditions

    • Correction of natural variations in color

    • Enhances colors that occur naturally

    • Provide color to colorless and “fun” foods

  • FDA’s regulations require evidence that colors are safe at intended level of use before adding it to foods. Specifications to approve the use of color additives in foods:

    • Types of foods colors can be added to

    • Maximum amounts allowed to be added

    • How the colors are to be declared on food label

  • When evaluating and approving the safety of a substance, the FDA considers the:

    • Composition and properties of the substance

    • Amount that would typically be consumed

    • Immediate and long-term health effects

    • Purity and acceptable levels of impurities

  • FDA classifies permitted food colors by 2 certifications, both must meet the same safety standard prior to their use in foods:

    • Certified color additives - synthetically produced (human made) dyes, lakes or pigments. Chemically classified as ‘azo, xanthene, triphenylmethane and indigoid dyes’. The FDA chemically analyzes each new batch of color additive to ensure required specifications are met before used in foods.

    • Exempt from certification - naturally sourced dyes and pigments derived from vegetables, minerals or animals. The users are responsible for ensuring each new batch of color additives comply with their listing regulations though FDA must approve them before used in foods.

  • Fun Fact: the FDA requires manufacturers list all ingredients in each product on its label, with the ingredient used most first, followed in descending order by the smaller amounts. Color additives that must be Certified by the FDA (Blue 1, Red 40, etc) must be labeled as such. Color additives Exempt from Certification (annatto extract, beta-carotene, spirulina, etc) can be alternatively listed as ‘artificial colors’, ‘artificial color added’, ‘color added’! How confusing. - Carmine / Cochineal extract / Natural Red 4, though ‘exempt’, must be listed by its name(s) to easily identify for those to which it poses allergic threats.

(HERE) is the United States Foods, Drugs, Cosmetics and Medical Devices ‘Summary of Color Additives’ and their EEC numbers (example: E133, E132, E127, E171, etc.)

Names for each Food Certified Color Additive / Artificial Dye

FD&C Blue No. 1 / Blue No. 1 / Brilliant Blue FCF / acid blue 9 / E133

FD&C Blue No. 2 / Blue No. 2 / Indigotine / Indigo Carmine / E132

FD&C Green No. 3 / Green No. 3 / Fast Green FCF / E143

Orange B

Citrus Red No. 2 / Citrus Red 2 / C.I. Solvent Red 80 / C.I. 12156

FD&C Red No. 3 / Red No. 3 / Erythrosine / E127

FD&C Red No. 40 / Red No. 40 / Allura Red AC / E129

FD&C Yellow No. 5 / Yellow No. 5 / Tartrazine / E102

FD&C Yellow No. 6 / Yellow No. 6 / Sunset Yellow FCF / E110

When you see ‘lake’ at the end of a dye name it means aluminum hydroxide was added to turn the dye from a water-soluble (liquid) to a non-water soluble (solid like a powder).

How Artificial Food Colors Are Made

Artificial food colors start as petroleum or coal products - the same raw materials used for making gasoline and other industrial chemicals. Manufacturers transform these materials into food dyes through complex chemical processes using strong industrial chemicals like sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide.

Think of it like a very sophisticated chemistry experiment, but on an industrial scale, designed to create the exact colors that make our foods look appealing.

The manufacturing process uses several types of chemicals that can have negative impacts on human, animal and plant health. A few examples:

Industrial Solvents

These are strong chemicals used to dissolve other substances during manufacturing. Similar to how paint thinner has a strong smell that can make you feel sick, these solvents can cause headaches, dizziness, and nausea. Regular exposure over many years might harm the liver and kidneys.

Metal-Based Catalysts

These helps speed up chemical reactions during manufacturing. Some of these metals can potentially cause cancer or allergic reactions, and they can build up in the body over time - similar to how mercury from certain fish can accumulate in people who eat them frequently.

Sulfur Chemicals

These can irritate the lungs and breathing passages, making them particularly problematic for people with asthma or other breathing conditions. Some people may also be allergic to these compounds.

Air Pollutants

The manufacturing process releases nitrogen oxides - the same type of pollution that comes from car exhaust. These chemicals contribute to air pollution and can make breathing problems worse.

Making artificial food colors requires a lot of energy and creates chemical waste that needs special handling. Companies must use specialized facilities and follow strict rules to dispose of these wastes safely and prevent environmental contamination. The whole process - from manufacturing to waste disposal - contributes to environmental pollution and energy consumption. Which brings us to...

Environmental Effects of Artificial Food Colors

The manufacturing of artificial food dyes creates significant environmental pollution. During production, factories release harmful chemicals into the air, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) - think of the strong fumes you smell from fresh paint or gasoline. They also emit heavy metals that can be toxic to plants and animals. These industrial emissions contribute to both local air pollution and broader environmental contamination.

Water Impact

When food containing artificial dyes gets thrown away or washed down drains, these colors end up in our water systems. Unlike natural food stains that fade away, artificial dyes can stay in the water for a long time. Scientists have found that even small amounts of these dyes can harm fish and other water creatures - imagine putting a drop of food coloring in a fish tank and it never fully going away.

Slow to Break Down

Natural colors, like those from beets or carrots, eventually decompose like other food waste. But artificial dyes are different - they're designed to last, which means they stick around in the environment for a very long time. One common blue dye (Brilliant Blue FCF) has been found lingering in water treatment plants and natural waterways because it's so hard to break down.

High Energy Use

Making artificial dyes requires a lot of energy - much more than producing natural food colors. This means more electricity usage and more fossil fuels burned, which adds to climate change. It's like comparing the energy needed to grow and juice a carrot versus running a factory to make artificial orange coloring.

Microplastic Problems

Some artificial dyes are made into tiny particles called "lake pigments" that don't dissolve in water. When exposed to sunlight over time, these can break down into even tinier pieces, becoming microplastics. These microscopic particles can then spread throughout water systems and potentially harm wildlife - similar to how we've found plastic microbeads from cosmetics in oceans and lakes.

While the environmental impacts of artificial food dyes are concerning, their effects don't stop at the natural world. These same chemicals that persist in our environment can also find their way into the human body through the food we eat, the water we drink, and the air we breathe. This raises important questions about how these synthetic dyes might affect human health - from allergic reactions to potential long-term health effects.

Health Concerns About Artificial Food Colors

While artificial food colors are approved as safe by government agencies like the FDA, ongoing scientific research continues to raise important questions about their effects on human health. Recent studies from major institutions have highlighted several potential concerns that deserve closer attention, particularly regarding how these synthetic compounds might affect children and sensitive individuals. Let's examine the key issues researchers have identified.

Cancer and Toxic Substances

History has shown us we need to be careful with artificial dyes - some previously used colors, like Red #2, were banned in the 1970s after being linked to cancer. Even today's approved dyes can contain small amounts of concerning substances like arsenic, lead and mercury, though at levels deemed "safe" by regulators. Think of it like chlorine in a swimming pool - a tiny amount is considered safe, but that doesn't mean it's completely risk-free.

Effects on Children's Behavior

Recent research, particularly a major 2022 study by California health officials, suggests that artificial food colors might affect how some children behave. These dyes have been linked to increased hyperactivity - similar to how too much caffeine might make someone feel jittery or restless. Some children seem to be more sensitive to these effects than others, mine included.

Brain and Nervous System

Scientists studying both humans and animals have found that artificial food colors might affect brain function. Animal studies show these dyes could impact memory, learning and even cause tiny changes in brain structure. It's like subtle interference in a radio signal - the changes might be small, but they could be significant.

Long-term Cell Damage

Some concerning evidence suggests that artificial food dyes might damage our DNA over time. The European Food Safety Authority has found that certain dyes could be "genotoxic" - meaning they might harm our genetic material. These dyes can also build up in our bodies over time, similar to how heavy metals can accumulate in fish.

Hormone System Effects

Scientists are discovering that some artificial food colors might interfere with our hormones - the chemical messengers that help regulate everything from growth to metabolism. These dyes might either mimic our natural hormones or block them from working properly, potentially disrupting normal body functions.

Beyond these human health concerns, much of what we know about artificial food dyes comes from extensive animal testing. These laboratory studies have been crucial in identifying potential risks, as they allow researchers to observe effects that might be 'difficult or unethical' to study directly in humans. The findings from animal research have often served as early warning signs, leading to deeper investigation of how these synthetic colors might affect human health and development.

Animal Testing

For decades, scientists have relied on laboratory animals to test the safety of artificial food dyes before they can be used in our food. This testing is often harsh - researchers feed large doses of dyes to rats and mice to observe any harmful effects. They also conduct long-running studies to look for chronic health problems and examine how these dyes might affect an animal's ability to reproduce or impact their developing offspring.

Current Requirements and Ethical Concerns

Despite growing ethical concerns, major regulatory agencies like the FDA in the United States and EFSA in Europe still require extensive animal testing before approving new food dyes. This raises an important question, particularly for vegans: can artificial food colors truly be considered vegan-friendly if their approval process depends on animal testing? It's similar to the debate around medicines that are plant-based but require animal testing for safety approval.

Laboratory Research Findings

Studies on laboratory animals have revealed several concerning effects of artificial food dyes. In research published in the journal "Toxicological Sciences," rats fed high doses of Red 3 developed thyroid tumors. Similar studies with Yellow 5 and Yellow 6, published in "Food and Chemical Toxicology," showed these dyes could cause kidney and adrenal gland damage in mice when given in large amounts over time.

  • Behavioral Effects

    • Research published in "Neurotoxicology and Teratology" found that mice exposed to mixtures of common food dyes showed significant changes in behavior. The animals displayed increased activity levels and reduced attention spans - similar to symptoms observed in children sensitive to these dyes. A notable study at the University of Liverpool showed that when rats consumed Red 40 and Yellow 5, they exhibited hyperactive behaviors and had difficulty learning maze patterns compared to untreated rats.

  • Reproductive and Developmental Impacts

    • Long-term studies, including those reviewed by the European Food Safety Authority, have shown that some dyes can affect animal reproduction. For example, mice exposed to high levels of Blue 1 during pregnancy had offspring with slightly lower birth weights. Research published in "Environmental Health Perspectives" found that rats exposed to Red 40 throughout pregnancy showed subtle changes in their offspring's brain development.

  • Cellular Effects

    • More recent laboratory studies, as reported in "Food and Chemical Toxicology," have shown that some artificial dyes can cause oxidative stress in animal cells - a type of chemical damage that could potentially lead to various health problems. For instance, studies with Yellow 5 showed it could damage DNA in mouse liver cells when given in high concentrations.

Limitations of Animal Testing

Animal testing has been the standard method for safety evaluation, it has significant drawbacks. While these studies suggest potential concerns, it's important to remember that the doses used in animal testing are often much higher than what people would typically consume in food. Animals don't always react to substances the same way humans do, which means these tests might not accurately predict human responses. The process is also time-consuming and resource intensive. The relevance of these findings to human health continues to be debated in the scientific community.

The Future of Safety Testing

Scientists are developing promising alternatives to animal testing that could be both more ethical and more accurate. These innovative approaches could revolutionize how we test food additives, potentially providing better safety data while reducing reliance on animal testing.

  • Laboratory-grown human cell systems that can show how our bodies might react to dyes

  • Miniature organ models created from stem cells

  • Advanced computer simulations using artificial intelligence to predict safety

  • Biochemical systems that mirror human biology

Animal-Derived Food Colors and Ingredients

While many people think of food coloring as purely synthetic chemicals, several common colorings and related ingredients actually come from animal sources. These ingredients might not be obvious from their names on food labels, and some aren't even listed because they're used in processing rather than as direct ingredients.

Common Animal-Based Colorings:

Carmine (Red #4) This bright red color comes from an unexpected source - tiny insects called cochineals that live on prickly pear cacti in Peru and the Canary Islands. The process is quite intensive: about 70,000 beetles are collected, dried in the sun, crushed, and treated with an acidic alcohol solution to create just one pound of this red dye. You might find it listed as carmine, cochineal, or Red #4 on labels.

Shellac (Confectioner's Glaze) That shiny coating on candies and some fruits? It often comes from female lac bugs native to India. These insects create tunnels with their secretions a.k.a. poop! on tree branches. These secretions are collected, filtered to remove bits of bark and insects then processed into flakes. On labels, you might see it as "confectioner's glaze" or "shellac."

Hidden Animal Processing Aids:

Bone Char While not directly added to food, bone char - made from burned cattle bones - is used by some sugar refineries to whiten sugar. This affects any food coloring made with this processed sugar. The char works like activated carbon, removing about 80% of the natural color from raw sugar cane.

Animal-Based Carriers:

Lanolin This waxy substance, which comes from sheep's wool glands, is sometimes used as a base for synthetic food colors. It's naturally produced by sheep to protect their wool from weather.

Casein This protein from mammal milk is sometimes used to carry food colorings. While it's not a color itself, it helps distribute the coloring in food products.

While these animal-derived food colorings raise concerns for vegans and others avoiding animal products, the good news is that there are many natural, plant-based alternatives available. From vibrant beet juice to golden turmeric, nature provides a rainbow of options that can add beautiful colors to food without relying on animal ingredients or synthetic dyes. Let's explore some of these natural alternatives and how they're being used in modern food production.

Natural Colors From Plant Sources

As consumers seek healthier and more environmentally friendly options, food manufacturers are turning to plants to provide vibrant, natural colors for our food. These alternatives often bring bonus health benefits along with their beautiful hues.

Rainbow of Natural Options:

Reds and Pinks Beet juice leads the way in natural red coloring, offering a vibrant crimson hue thanks to compounds called betaines. Unlike artificial reds, beets add nutritional value along with their color.

Yellows and Oranges Turmeric, a spice long used in traditional cooking, provides a bright yellow color through its active compound curcumin. Similarly, carotenoids from carrots and marigolds create warm orange and yellow tones, while paprika from peppers offers a range from yellow to deep red.

Blues and Purples One of the most exciting developments is blue coloring from spirulina, a blue-green algae that produces a natural pigment called phycocyanin. For purple and blue shades, anthocyanins from berries and other fruits offer a beautiful spectrum of colors.

Greens Chlorophyll, the compound that makes plants green, can be extracted and used as a natural food coloring, bringing the fresh color of vegetables to processed foods.

While these natural alternatives offer many benefits, including antioxidant properties and other health-promoting compounds, they do present some challenges. They typically cost more than artificial dyes and may not stay stable as long on store shelves. However, as technology improves and demand increases, food manufacturers are finding innovative ways to overcome these hurdles.

Conclusion

The use of artificial food colors in our food supply is a complex issue that sits at the intersection of consumer preferences, industry practices and regulatory standards. While these synthetic dyes have long been a staple in food manufacturing due to their shelf stability, vibrant hues and cost-effectiveness, growing concerns about their environmental impact and potential health effects are shifting the landscape.

As consumers become more informed and health-conscious, there's an increasing demand for natural alternatives. This trend is pushing the food industry to innovate, developing new techniques to create appealing, longer shelf-life natural colors that can match the performance of artificial dyes. However, the transition is not without challenges, as natural colors often come with higher costs, shorter shelf life and less consistency in hue.

Regulation entities worldwide continue to monitor the safety of artificial food colors, but the standards and restrictions vary significantly between countries. This discrepancy highlights the need for ongoing research and potentially more harmonized global standards.

As we move forward, it's crucial for consumers, manufacturers and regulators to engage in open dialogue about the role of food colors in our diet and their broader impact on health and the environment. By making informed choices and supporting responsible practices, we can work towards a food system that is both visually appealing and aligned with our health and environmental goals.

Connect With Us

We have an opportunity to grow a community of dye-free plant-based individuals! Contact us with suggestions for an article, constructive feedback or just to say hi!

We love to hear from fellow plant-based enthusiasts!

We're glad you're here. 🌻